| Title | Può un uomo generarsi nell’utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averroè |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Noctua |
| Volume | X |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 46-105 |
| Categories | Averroism, Latin Averroism, Natural Philosophy, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Mario Loconsole |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Latin Europe, the controversy over spontaneous generation of perfect animals – namely those whose breeding occurs through sexual reproduction – is received in different ways, varying from positions very close to Avicenna’s, as in the case of Pietro Pomponazzi, to interpretations that rather refer to Averroes’ perspective. To this ‘Averroist front’ undoubtedly belongs the figure of Urbano da Bologna, author of the Expositio commenti Averrois in VIII libros Physicorum – a work that can be defined a supercommentary to Averroes’ Physica – composed in Bologna around 1334. The present study aims to provide the complete transcription of a quaestio that is present in the work – but which was disputed according to its author also in public – as an example of the elaboration of the theme of spontaneous generation in the early 14th century. The text deals with many aspects of the problem, especially elaborating on the correspondence between each specific form and its appropriate matter, in the light of the lively debates of the time, and reveals a mature understanding of Aristotle’s natural philosophy and its Averroist interpretation. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5600","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5600,"authors_free":[{"id":6501,"entry_id":5600,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mario Loconsole","free_first_name":"Mario ","free_last_name":"Loconsole","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"In Latin Europe, the controversy over spontaneous generation of perfect animals \u2013 namely those whose breeding occurs through sexual reproduction \u2013 is received in different ways, varying from positions very close to Avicenna\u2019s, as in the case of Pietro Pomponazzi, to interpretations that rather refer to Averroes\u2019 perspective. To this \u2018Averroist front\u2019 undoubtedly belongs the figure of Urbano da Bologna, author of the Expositio commenti Averrois in VIII libros Physicorum \u2013 a work that can be defined a supercommentary to Averroes\u2019 Physica \u2013 composed in Bologna around 1334. The present study aims to provide the complete transcription of a quaestio that is present in the work \u2013 but which was disputed according to its author also in public \u2013 as an example of the elaboration of the theme of spontaneous generation in the early 14th century. The text deals with many aspects of the problem, especially elaborating on the correspondence between each specific form and its appropriate matter, in the light of the lively debates of the time, and reveals a mature understanding of Aristotle\u2019s natural philosophy and its Averroist interpretation.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14640\/NoctuaX2","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5600,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Noctua","volume":"X","issue":"1","pages":"46-105"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo's "De Motu Antiquiora" and the Quaestiones de Motu Elementorum of the Pisan Professors |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2000 |
| Journal | Early Science and Medicine |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 319-365 |
| Categories | Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Michele Camerota , Mario Helbing |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/4130371 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5741","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5741,"authors_free":[{"id":6648,"entry_id":5741,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1886,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michele Camerota","free_first_name":"Michele ","free_last_name":"Camerota","norm_person":{"id":1886,"first_name":"Michele ","last_name":"Camerota","full_name":"Michele Camerota","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132142511","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Michele Camerota"}},{"id":6649,"entry_id":5741,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mario Helbing","free_first_name":"Mario","free_last_name":"Helbing","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo's \"De Motu Antiquiora\" and the Quaestiones de Motu Elementorum of the Pisan Professors","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo's \"De Motu Antiquiora\" and the Quaestiones de Motu Elementorum of the Pisan Professors"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2000","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/4130371","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":1886,"full_name":"Michele Camerota","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5741,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Early Science and Medicine","volume":"5","issue":"4","pages":"319-365"}},"sort":[2000]}
| Title | Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo's "De Motu Antiquiora" and the Quaestiones de Motu Elementorum of the Pisan Professors |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2000 |
| Journal | Early Science and Medicine |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 319-365 |
| Categories | Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Michele Camerota , Mario Helbing |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/4130371 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5741","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5741,"authors_free":[{"id":6648,"entry_id":5741,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1886,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michele Camerota","free_first_name":"Michele ","free_last_name":"Camerota","norm_person":{"id":1886,"first_name":"Michele ","last_name":"Camerota","full_name":"Michele Camerota","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132142511","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Michele Camerota"}},{"id":6649,"entry_id":5741,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mario Helbing","free_first_name":"Mario","free_last_name":"Helbing","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo's \"De Motu Antiquiora\" and the Quaestiones de Motu Elementorum of the Pisan Professors","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo's \"De Motu Antiquiora\" and the Quaestiones de Motu Elementorum of the Pisan Professors"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2000","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/4130371","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":1886,"full_name":"Michele Camerota","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5741,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Early Science and Medicine","volume":"5","issue":"4","pages":"319-365"}},"sort":["Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo's \"De Motu Antiquiora\" and the Quaestiones de Motu Elementorum of the Pisan Professors"]}
| Title | Può un uomo generarsi nell’utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averroè |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Noctua |
| Volume | X |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 46-105 |
| Categories | Averroism, Latin Averroism, Natural Philosophy, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Mario Loconsole |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Latin Europe, the controversy over spontaneous generation of perfect animals – namely those whose breeding occurs through sexual reproduction – is received in different ways, varying from positions very close to Avicenna’s, as in the case of Pietro Pomponazzi, to interpretations that rather refer to Averroes’ perspective. To this ‘Averroist front’ undoubtedly belongs the figure of Urbano da Bologna, author of the Expositio commenti Averrois in VIII libros Physicorum – a work that can be defined a supercommentary to Averroes’ Physica – composed in Bologna around 1334. The present study aims to provide the complete transcription of a quaestio that is present in the work – but which was disputed according to its author also in public – as an example of the elaboration of the theme of spontaneous generation in the early 14th century. The text deals with many aspects of the problem, especially elaborating on the correspondence between each specific form and its appropriate matter, in the light of the lively debates of the time, and reveals a mature understanding of Aristotle’s natural philosophy and its Averroist interpretation. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5600","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5600,"authors_free":[{"id":6501,"entry_id":5600,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mario Loconsole","free_first_name":"Mario ","free_last_name":"Loconsole","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"In Latin Europe, the controversy over spontaneous generation of perfect animals \u2013 namely those whose breeding occurs through sexual reproduction \u2013 is received in different ways, varying from positions very close to Avicenna\u2019s, as in the case of Pietro Pomponazzi, to interpretations that rather refer to Averroes\u2019 perspective. To this \u2018Averroist front\u2019 undoubtedly belongs the figure of Urbano da Bologna, author of the Expositio commenti Averrois in VIII libros Physicorum \u2013 a work that can be defined a supercommentary to Averroes\u2019 Physica \u2013 composed in Bologna around 1334. The present study aims to provide the complete transcription of a quaestio that is present in the work \u2013 but which was disputed according to its author also in public \u2013 as an example of the elaboration of the theme of spontaneous generation in the early 14th century. The text deals with many aspects of the problem, especially elaborating on the correspondence between each specific form and its appropriate matter, in the light of the lively debates of the time, and reveals a mature understanding of Aristotle\u2019s natural philosophy and its Averroist interpretation.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14640\/NoctuaX2","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5600,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Noctua","volume":"X","issue":"1","pages":"46-105"}},"sort":["Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8"]}